<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Moore on Wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20070824/michael-moore-on-wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20070824/michael-moore-on-wikipedia/</link>
	<description>It's only a website... it's only a website...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: blissyu2</title>
		<link>http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20070824/michael-moore-on-wikipedia/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>blissyu2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20070824/michael-moore-on-wikipedia/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>I didn't do an in-depth study in to what his 96 edits to "Sicko" were, nor what his 209 article talk messages on "Sicko" said, nor what his various project talk messages, in such sections as "Conflict of Interest Noticeboard" said.  It could well be that there is much more to find in this one.  As for finding his proxy edits, that's a bit of a tough one, as you then have to link that back to him in a definitive way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t do an in-depth study in to what his 96 edits to &#8220;Sicko&#8221; were, nor what his 209 article talk messages on &#8220;Sicko&#8221; said, nor what his various project talk messages, in such sections as &#8220;Conflict of Interest Noticeboard&#8221; said.  It could well be that there is much more to find in this one.  As for finding his proxy edits, that&#8217;s a bit of a tough one, as you then have to link that back to him in a definitive way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moonie</title>
		<link>http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20070824/michael-moore-on-wikipedia/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Moonie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 08:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20070824/michael-moore-on-wikipedia/#comment-157</guid>
		<description>If you include all of Ted Franks proxy edits - words that encourage other users (like Noroton) to alter the Sicko page - then there are scores more.

Ted Frank is also in the process of writting an attack piece on Sicko for wider publication. He openly said so on the Sicko talk page.

I've not seen anything like this on Wikipedia before. And it's so blatant, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you include all of Ted Franks proxy edits - words that encourage other users (like Noroton) to alter the Sicko page - then there are scores more.</p>
<p>Ted Frank is also in the process of writting an attack piece on Sicko for wider publication. He openly said so on the Sicko talk page.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve not seen anything like this on Wikipedia before. And it&#8217;s so blatant, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
