the wikipedia review

It’s only a website… it’s only a website…

Time to change public opinion of Wikipedia

with 22 comments

Something monumentally offensive has happened this week on Wikipedia, and the powers that be are trying to sweep it under the rug. All Wikipedia critics should take this excellent opportunity to write letters to the Editors of their local and regional newspapers, and to contact their elected officials. The public opinion of Wikipedia can and should be changed by these six simple points:

1. Wikipedia is the world’s largest encyclopedia. It is managed by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF), and its mission is to provide free and open dissemination of knowledge to the world, in many languages.

2. Both the WMF and the for-profit enterprise Wikia, Inc. have personnel who serve on the Boards of both organizations. Wikia, Inc. — a company financed with $14 million in venture capital — is mentioned in WMF Form 990 documents filed with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service that maintain there are no conflicts of interest in the cross-management of the two organizations.

3. However, it was revealed this week that Wikia, Inc. was hosting a secret mailing list comprised exclusively of hand-picked Wikipedia administrators and certain representatives of the Foundation, including Wikipedia co-founder himself, Jimmy Wales.

4. This mailing list’s secret activity centered on discussion of the identities and even IP addresses of various “questionable” contributors to the Wikipedia encyclopedia, in order to build “wiki sleuthing” cases against said contributors. This past week, the list’s spurious findings prompted the indefinite blocking of a long-standing valuable contributor to Wikipedia’s pages. When evidence of this list was exposed by a whistle-blower (one also having a long record of writing “featured articles” on Wikipedia), that evidence was repeatedly suppressed or erased by a senior staff member of the WMF. Days later, the cited ownership of the secret list was even altered, to protect the guilty party.

5. Instead of thanking the whistle-blower, Jimmy Wales replied to him with this shocking remark, “…your behavior in terms of trolling and carrying on the way you do is unacceptable. You know this. And you will either change it or be banned from Wikipedia. You have caused too much harm to justify us putting up with this kind of behavior much longer.”

6. No wonder the Wikimedia Foundation is falling far short of its fundraising objectives this year. Its management is too infiltrated with bankrupt ethics, which thoughtful people of conscience wouldn’t dream of supporting financially.

For those of you who may need a little “boost” in helping to get the campaign out there:

Here are two “Letters to the Editor” tools based on your ZIP code, where you can send one letter to numerous newspapers in your area:

Democratic version

Republican version

And a finder and e-mail form (based on your ZIP code) to write your US Senators, US Representative, and State elected officials is right here.

If you wish to file a complaint with the IRS, that’s a little more challenging, but the appropriate form may be completed at this site. One might choose from “False documents” (for the incorrectly completed Form 990) and/or “Public corruption” (for using private donations to fund a secret mailing list on a conflicted for-profit website). But the point is, Wikia, Inc. is enabling certain members of the Wikipedia community and one (or more) principals of the Wikimedia Foundation to literally spy on editors they find suspicious (and, as this week proved, often based on preposterously misguided evidence).

Keep in mind, we are not attempting to bring about an immediate injunction against the WMF or the collapse of Wikipedia, and that’s why I’m not recommending that one attorney or one particular tax auditor be contacted. Rather, we are trying to change the hearts and minds of the general public. Regular people need to start seeing the corrupt management of Wikipedia and start asking their own questions. It will only take a seed of doubt to get people talking about what happened this week at Wikipedia, the world’s most irresponsible encyclopedia. Everything else will fall into place once that is achieved.


Written by Selina

November 27th, 2007 at 5:43 am

22 Responses to 'Time to change public opinion of Wikipedia'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Time to change public opinion of Wikipedia'.

  1. See the Video Version Here:

  2. It’s intetesting that the Democrats are a “.org” while the Republicans are a “.com”… does that mean the Republicans are just in it for the money? (But, then, Wikipedia is a “.org” and Wikipedia Review is a “.com”…)

    Dan T.

    27 Nov 07 at 12:42 pm

  3. Dan,

    I’m guessing that your middle name is either Oscar or Otto. You really oughta start signing yourself as Dan O.T.

    JA, JA, JA

    Jon Awbrey

    27 Nov 07 at 10:30 pm

  4. I’m glad to be a visitant of this complete weblog ! , thankyou for this rare info ! .

  5. I’m extremely impressed with your writing skills and also with the layout on your weblog. Is this a paid theme or did you modify it yourself? Anyway keep up the excellent quality writing, it’s rare to see a great blog like this one nowadays..

    Gino Groome

    29 Jan 12 at 9:43 pm

  6. hello there and thank you for your info – I have definitely picked up anything new from right here. I did however expertise some technical issues using this web site, since I experienced to reload the site many times previous to I could get it to load properly. I had been wondering if your web host is OK? Not that I am complaining, but slow loading instances times will sometimes affect your placement in google and can damage your quality score if advertising and marketing with Adwords. Anyway I’m adding this RSS to my e-mail and can look out for much more of your respective interesting content. Ensure that you update this again soon..

    Raquel Hartrick

    18 Mar 12 at 1:08 am

  7. this kind of is something i have never ever read.really detailed analysis.

    Alethia Shall

    18 Mar 12 at 6:01 pm

  8. Wow, superb weblog format! How lengthy have you been blogging for? you make running a blog look easy. The overall glance of your web site is magnificent, let alone the content! CGS London Escorts, 35, Palmer St, London, SW1H 0PH, 028 8008 0097

    Santiago Heldman

    21 Mar 12 at 5:38 am

  9. Hi our family loves your wonderful editorial thanx and pls stick to it

  10. A fantastic write-up. My partner and i find out one thing totally new in various sites daily. Number of stimulating to find out to learn to read written content by various other copy writers and find out a little from their retail store. I’d like to use many for this articles about the blog site all-natural thoughts. Natually I will source hyperlink upon site. Appreciate your own expressing.

    Tyron Heverin

    1 May 12 at 6:38 pm

  11. Nice Blog. Do you find it harder to rank in Google with a australian site?

  12. Can I just say what a aid to seek out somebody who actually is aware of what theyre talking about on the internet. You undoubtedly know the way to deliver a problem to mild and make it important. More people must learn this and perceive this side of the story. I cant imagine youre no more common because you undoubtedly have the gift.

    Ariana Cairns

    2 Aug 12 at 6:07 am

  13. Time to change public opinion of Wikipedia at Wikipedia Review: Opinions and Editorials cool post

    Karry Hobby

    5 Mar 13 at 8:09 pm

  14. What’s up, after reading this awesome paragraph i am
    too happy to share my experience here with colleagues.

  15. We are a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme
    in our community. Your site offered us with valuable info to work on.
    You have done a formidable job and our whole community will
    be thankful to you.

    Raspberry Ketone

    17 Oct 13 at 10:48 pm

  16. Surplus is any gear, items, or inventory that nevertheless owns worth however might not be purchased regardless of no matter whether retail, wholesale, or standard price. It can be brought on by discontinuations, overstock, overruns or closeouts. Overrun or overstock will be the final outcome of purchase not actually in compliance with the amount of substance necessary. These are earliest quality merchandise.

  17. Thank you for revealing this particular with men and women that you realize what you’re talking somewhere around! Bookmarked. Make sure you furthermore consult with our web site Equates to). You can easliy possess a link buy and sell long term contract between you

  18. Do you have a spam problem on this site; I also am a blogger, and I was wondering your situation; many of us have developed some nice procedures and we are looking to swap strategies with other folks, please shoot me an email if interested.

  19. you’re really a good webmaster. The site loading speed is
    incredible. It kind of feels that you are doing any distinctive trick.

    Furthermore, The contents are masterpiece. you have done a
    wonderful process on this matter!

  20. not surprisingly just like your web-site however, you use apple iphone 4 punctuation on a good number of within your posts. A few of them usually are rife having spelling issues i in discovering them very disturbing to make sure reality on the other hand will surely occur just as before once more.

  21. Hey there I am so happy I found your website, I really found
    you by error, while I was browsing on Yahoo for something else, Nonetheless I am here now and would just like to say thank you for a incredible post and a all round entertaining blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to look
    over it all at the minute but I have book-marked it and also added in your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read
    more, Please do keep up the fantastic work.

    Look at my blog post: Celebrity skin

    Celebrity skin

    16 Aug 14 at 7:37 am

Leave a Reply