http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20080423/meet-the-metz-ten-of-the-best-from-the-register/ It's only a website... it's only a website... Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:08:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20080423/meet-the-metz-ten-of-the-best-from-the-register/#comment-1771 Derktar Mon, 19 May 2008 03:07:08 +0000 http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20080423/meet-the-metz-ten-of-the-best-from-the-register/#comment-1771 Have a look through the horror that is the BLP scene alone and you will come to understand Retarius. Have a look through the horror that is the BLP scene alone and you will come to understand Retarius.

]]> http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20080423/meet-the-metz-ten-of-the-best-from-the-register/#comment-1763 Wikipedia User:Retarius Fri, 16 May 2008 06:31:35 +0000 http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20080423/meet-the-metz-ten-of-the-best-from-the-register/#comment-1763 As an intermittent contributor to Wikipedia, there's one fundamental thing that puzzles me about this site and others like it: I really don't understand how y'all can be bothered. As an intermittent contributor to Wikipedia, there’s one fundamental thing that puzzles me about this site and others like it: I really don’t understand how y’all can be bothered.

]]> http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20080423/meet-the-metz-ten-of-the-best-from-the-register/#comment-1762 wikipediot in big lick gulch Mon, 12 May 2008 23:08:34 +0000 http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20080423/meet-the-metz-ten-of-the-best-from-the-register/#comment-1762 Re 5-10 thread on William Connolley, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:William_Connolley#Note_about_Solomons_Column Re 5-10 thread on William Connolley, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:William_Connolley#Note_about_Solomons_Column

]]> http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20080423/meet-the-metz-ten-of-the-best-from-the-register/#comment-1755 Malber Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:33:20 +0000 http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20080423/meet-the-metz-ten-of-the-best-from-the-register/#comment-1755 Good articles all. Good companion to the Orlowski articles and definitely a primer on criticism of WP. Good articles all. Good companion to the Orlowski articles and definitely a primer on criticism of WP.

]]>