Comments on: Wikipedia Vandalism Study - US Senators http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20081005/wikipedia-vandalism-study-us-senators/ It's only a website... it's only a website... Wed, 22 May 2013 11:11:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: Somey http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20081005/wikipedia-vandalism-study-us-senators/#comment-2834 Somey Thu, 14 Apr 2011 06:03:27 +0000 http://wikipediareview.com/blog/?p=143#comment-2834 @Mr. McKnight: If only that were true. (It isn't.) Even so, "accuracy" isn't the only thing that makes for a good encyclopedia, is it? @Mr. McKnight: If only that were true. (It isn’t.)

Even so, “accuracy” isn’t the only thing that makes for a good encyclopedia, is it?

]]> By: Rick McKnight http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20081005/wikipedia-vandalism-study-us-senators/#comment-2628 Rick McKnight Tue, 28 Dec 2010 18:39:54 +0000 http://wikipediareview.com/blog/?p=143#comment-2628 I used to think it was a bad thing to have anybody posting, but then I trad that the accuracy rate of Wikipedia is higher than that of most "prestigious" Encyclopedias. I used to think it was a bad thing to have anybody posting, but then I trad that the accuracy rate of Wikipedia is higher than that of most “prestigious” Encyclopedias.

]]> By: sbrown http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20081005/wikipedia-vandalism-study-us-senators/#comment-2039 sbrown Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:32:18 +0000 http://wikipediareview.com/blog/?p=143#comment-2039 Clearly nothing has happened. Clearly nothing has happened.

]]> By: John A http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20081005/wikipedia-vandalism-study-us-senators/#comment-1795 John A Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:25:58 +0000 http://wikipediareview.com/blog/?p=143#comment-1795 Now that they know this, what are they able to do about it? Now that they know this, what are they able to do about it?

]]> By: MrDolomite http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20081005/wikipedia-vandalism-study-us-senators/#comment-1794 MrDolomite Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:23:49 +0000 http://wikipediareview.com/blog/?p=143#comment-1794 An excellent study and posting. Yet another reason why WP should not allow IP editors. An interesting topic for a future study would be to take all IP edits for a given timeframe and determine what percentage of them are "damaging" edits. An excellent study and posting.

Yet another reason why WP should not allow IP editors.

An interesting topic for a future study would be to take all IP edits for a given timeframe and determine what percentage of them are “damaging” edits.

]]>