http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:PhilosophyI keep coming back to this page, mainly because it gets 5,000 hits a day (that's nearly 2m people a year rely on it as a source of knowledge about an academic subject. I am taking on 4 people only 1 of whom has any kind of formal qualification that I can see. Someone claims
QUOTE
Kant, in particular, claimed that there were philosophical questions that could only be answered by going beyond reason.
I point out that the guy, by his own admission, has never read any Kant. And someone else claims
QUOTE
Someone please tell me, and keep reminding me, that anyone who gets involved with this project is fundamentally insane. thank you.
(What they are objecting to is a version of the introduction which was written by myself and a professional philosopher and which was good enough to be used by
Trinity College Dublin in their prospectus. Let's just step back and see ....)
This post has been edited by Peter Damian: