QUOTE(Gold heart @ Thu 18th September 2008, 1:39am)
What a load of "mungo pungo". The term "British Isles" does not exist in my studies, it's being pushed by a bunch of blibbering barnbots, aka the "British Isles Brigade". These guys are usually right-wing British Nationalists, who hate black people, Asians, and Islam, and some could also be of the Satanist persuasion. It they were in coven at the bottom of a lavatory, then I would surely flush it, or rocket them to a convenient "black hole" in deeper space. User Tharkumcoll is the leader of this unruly pack who "protect" the British Isles article at all costs, and with the support of British admins
Waggers and
Canterbury Tale. The saga will go on and on, I'm afraid! (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/huh.gif)
Roflmao! No Satanism isn't usually linked to National Socialism, although the rare few are like that they're usually condemned by the majority of Theistic Satanists. Your comment would be a 'personal attack' (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/biggrin.gif) (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/biggrin.gif) (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/biggrin.gif) if I didn't have to compliment you on your humour. (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/biggrin.gif)
The same with joining the BNP- thark and I, I imagine, would never bother or believe in that, we're too busy getting p*ssed or having a laugh. I try to define my politics as liberal/left wing socialist crossed with normal or something. Most of my politics agrees with having a 'nanny state', and I have to make a bit of an effort to escape the political correctness on which I was brought up- I don't know if Thark has to do that or if it comes naturally.
As to "British Isles"- maybe your 'studies' don't find it, but it frequently is used in the media in the real world in the UK, in which most people in the UK live.
It's sort of a shame this argument has come up again- but then it depends what the editors involved feel like doing at the time.
I'm only tangentially involved in this area on wikipedia by virtue of a friendship. I don't think editors usually involved in those articles would identify as Satanists- I don't know what Thark is nowadays, perhaps a hedonist who has to mock overly serious people or those with a politically correct or getting-offended-at-the-real-world agenda.
This post has been edited by wikiwhistle: