QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Thu 26th February 2009, 3:35pm)
Ooh!
Now, this is funny! Blog material!! And I just loooove how Protonk pretended to "calm the waters", whilst
taking a backhanded swipe at me.
If a turd drips in the wiki-forest, does it make a sound?
QUOTE
Ottava - stop stirring trouble. I'm not a 'prominent member' of Wikipedia Review - I'm a regular poster there. Unlike you, who got banned from there. Ooops - disclosure! (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) And again, what Eric said on there cannot be construed as 'harassment', at best, it's a direct observation, at worst, an offensive epithet. Time to move on and let it go - Alison ⤠22:14, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Can we not escalate this entire mess any further, before we start seeing meltdowns? rootology ©(T) 05:24, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Is Eric Barbour's statement verifiable? Wikipedia has strict conditions for verifiability. Richard Hock (talk) 11:28, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
That's not even original, that's just borrowed from what they were saying at WR. At least write your own material, dude!--Wehwalt (talk) 12:42, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
What's WR? Richard Hock (talk) 12:58, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Wrathful Rantings [pipelink to WP article on WR]; a website chock a block with generators and purveyors of hot air and the rare quite funny joke (some of whom are not WP admins, or even editors). LessHeard vanU (talk) 13:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Our feelings are hurt. I think quite funny jokes are more than rare on WR, LessHorrid. Not quite up to WP standards, but we try harder.
Of course, LH, not wanting to stir up trouble, failed to mention he posts here, also. Being pounced on by Ottava would not be a quite funny thing. No, not at all. (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) At least not if you're LessHorrid. (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/happy.gif)