QUOTE(LaraLove @ Sat 7th March 2009, 9:18am)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
QUOTE(Random832 @ Sat 7th March 2009, 11:51am)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
It is not in dispute here* that _someone_ leaked / is leaking messages from wikichix-l to Proabivouac (either that, or he somehow gained direct access himself). The only question is who. And the only plausible suspect I can think of is wikiwhistle.
*The possibility remains, I suppose, that the message he posted was a fabrication, but it seems likely someone would have called him on it were that the case
To be fair, you don't know the member list of Wikichix, so to say "the only plausible suspect I can think of is wikiwhistle" is sort of silly. Only suspect out of whom? Not all chicks on WP are members of this group, and not all members of this group are chicks. It could be any number of people. WW said she didn't do it, Proab says he doesn't have access. That doesn't mean that one of Proab's cronies doesn't have access, pretending to be a female... or that he doesn't have a female crony on the list willing to spill the secrets.
Indeed. It could be any of a number of other people that immediately come to mind, actually. I count four of five Chix members on WR right now, with little effort I'd also really like to know who it was who did leak that info, but he ain't tellin' (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/dry.gif)
QUOTE(LaraLove @ Sat 7th March 2009, 9:18am)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
Befriending someone like Proab is, in my opinion, ipso facto support of his actions. So for the sake of his cronies, I hope they've got a sturdy lock on the closet that holds their own skeletons, and no one who knows their secrets willing to spill them.
It's not ipso facto anything, any more than posting here is ipso facto support of WordBomb (remember
those days?) I don't buy guilt by association at all, sorry.