What are you doing, SV?, A brief review of Slim & "Animal Rights" Options

[Cla68]

What are your other accounts, SV/HFO? Do you have a problem with Tryptofish because he/she disagrees with some of the content in a certain article?

This post has been edited by Cla68:

[Bottled_Spider]

It's amazing how much drama can be generated on Wikipedia over wurdz, innit? It's even funnier when Slimmy gets involved and ends up looking like a prannie. Again. My advice to all concerned is to simply replace all instances of "her", "it", and "its" with "Monkey! Monkey!".

As for the picture, the pair of them are obviously preparing to indulge in a bit of fake-UFO photography. A few good out-of-focus shots and the monkey will make an excellent downed Venusian pilot, parachute cord wrapped round the neck. Yes; a space-parachute.

[Herschelkrustofsky]

It's amazing how much drama can be generated on Wikipedia over wurdz, innit? It's even funnier when Slimmy gets involved and ends up looking like a prannie. Again. My advice to all concerned is to simply replace all instances of "her", "it", and "its" with "Monkey! Monkey!".

One thing that strikes me about the whole "monkey gender" controversy is that it ignores the rather glaring Original Research, where the tableau is said to "epitomize the idea of animal ownership." It seems to me that the idea of animal ownership could just as easily be epitomized by the lady on TV, presenting Fancy Feast to her cat on a satin cushion, or some guy with his beloved seeing-eye dog.

[Milton Roe]

It's amazing how much drama can be generated on Wikipedia over wurdz, innit? It's even funnier when Slimmy gets involved and ends up looking like a prannie. Again. My advice to all concerned is to simply replace all instances of "her", "it", and "its" with "Monkey! Monkey!".

One thing that strikes me about the whole "monkey gender" controversy is that it ignores the rather glaring Original Research, where the tableau is said to "epitomize the idea of animal ownership." It seems to me that the idea of animal ownership could just as easily be epitomized by the lady on TV, presenting Fancy Feast to her cat on a satin cushion, or some guy with his beloved seeing-eye dog.

Where's the pathos in THOSE? The whole point is to emotionally polarize the article.

Sheesh.

[Cla68]

It's amazing how much drama can be generated on Wikipedia over wurdz, innit? It's even funnier when Slimmy gets involved and ends up looking like a prannie. Again. My advice to all concerned is to simply replace all instances of "her", "it", and "its" with "Monkey! Monkey!".

One thing that strikes me about the whole "monkey gender" controversy is that it ignores the rather glaring Original Research, where the tableau is said to "epitomize the idea of animal ownership." It seems to me that the idea of animal ownership could just as easily be epitomized by the lady on TV, presenting Fancy Feast to her cat on a satin cushion, or some guy with his beloved seeing-eye dog.

Where's the pathos in THOSE? The whole point is to emotionally polarize the article.

Sheesh.

I admit that I thought that Tryptofish's picture of the healthy-looking dog licking the laughing boy's face as the "epitome of animal ownership" was funny.

[Milton Roe]

It's amazing how much drama can be generated on Wikipedia over wurdz, innit? It's even funnier when Slimmy gets involved and ends up looking like a prannie. Again. My advice to all concerned is to simply replace all instances of "her", "it", and "its" with "Monkey! Monkey!".

One thing that strikes me about the whole "monkey gender" controversy is that it ignores the rather glaring Original Research, where the tableau is said to "epitomize the idea of animal ownership." It seems to me that the idea of animal ownership could just as easily be epitomized by the lady on TV, presenting Fancy Feast to her cat on a satin cushion, or some guy with his beloved seeing-eye dog.

Where's the pathos in THOSE? The whole point is to emotionally polarize the article.

Sheesh.

I admit that I thought that Tryptofish's picture of the healthy-looking dog licking the laughing boy's face as the "epitome of animal ownership" was funny.

But there are so many others that jerk chains even better:

(IMG:http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/ll191/Shrlocc/its-a-trap2.jpg)

[Cla68]

SV, you say that your questions for Tryptofish are about trolling, not sockpuppeting. However, in your post to that account's talk page, you asked about alternate accounts. That sounds like your making, at least implied, an accusation of socking.

Also, you say that Lar has been attacking you on wiki. Where on wiki has Lar been attacking you?

To be fair, I believe you are being trolled. When I was researching for the ArbCom case I saw that a couple of years ago there was an account who appeared to be trying to antagonize you via several of your animal rights articles. I don't remember the account's name. If you believe that Tryptofish is that account, you can say so here, because it's off-wiki and Tryptofish and the other account's name are anonymous account names, not real names.

Lar, Bainer, and Risker are correct in that if you're going to imply that socking is going on, you need to do so in the appropriate forum on wiki. Otherwise, Tryptofish should be treated as a good faith editor because so far he/she seems to be following the rules.

[Milton Roe]

SV, you say that your questions for Tryptofish are about trolling, not sockpuppeting. However, in your post to that account's talk page, you asked about alternate accounts. That sounds like your making, at least implied, an accusation of socking.

Also, you say that Lar has been attacking you on wiki. Where on wiki has Lar been attacking you?

To be fair, I believe you are being trolled. When I was researching for the ArbCom case I saw that a couple of years ago there was an account who appeared to be trying to antagonize you via several of your animal rights articles. I don't remember the account's name. If you believe that Tryptofish is that account, you can say so here, because it's off-wiki and Tryptofish and the other account's name are anonymous account names, not real names.

Lar, Bainer, and Risker are correct in that if you're going to imply that socking is going on, you need to do so in the appropriate forum on wiki. Otherwise, Tryptofish should be treated as a good faith editor because so far he/she seems to be following the rules.

See http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&sh...ndpost&p=165693 on the antics of "Resaunaut." WR is hardly above (below?) commenting on obviously socking or SPA accounts.

Tryptofish, by his/her edits, looks like a righteous biologist. If he/she is trolling SlimVirgin, it's because after a long time on WP, Trypto has identified SV as some bio-POV pusher that needs to be poked with a stick, to see what it does.

Good luck, Trypto. They're Africanized, you know. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/rolleyes.gif)