Shankbone vs. Kohs, part deux Options

[A Horse With No Name]

Our favorite evil queen is back in a new tsk-tsk against the beloved Mr. Kohs:

http://blog.shankbone.org/2009/04/14/greg-...edia-dramatica/

Kohs, take it from this horse's mouth -- Mr. Miller ain't good enough to flush your toilet!

[Alison]

So now David has resorted to googlebombing his Kohs article up the Google rankings by tagging the blog entry with Greg's place of employment, his position there, etc, etc. How utterly vindictive and how absolutely juvenile. He's like a tweenager indulging in a MySpace tiff.

Seriously, David - I know you're reading this. Please do us all a favour and grow up. You're a big child!! (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/angry.gif)

[Cla68]

So now David has resorted to googlebombing his Kohs article up the Google rankings by tagging the blog entry with Greg's place of employment, his position there, etc, etc. How utterly vindictive and how absolutely juvenile. He's like a tweenager indulging in a MySpace tiff.

Seriously, David - I know you're reading this. Please do us all a favour and grow up. You're a big child!! (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/angry.gif)

Who do we notifiy at the Foundation to tell them that they need to remove Shankbone's blog from their blog distro list?

[Noroton]

Who do we notifiy at the Foundation to tell them that they need to remove Shankbone's blog from their blog distro list?

In January, at Miller's request, his blog was taken off the Meta blog aggregator "Planet Wikimedia" (scroll down to "Requests for Removal")

Wikipedia has its own aggregator, "Open Wiki Blog Planet" (why pick a name that can be so easily confused with "Planet Wikimedia"??). Apparently User:Nickj operates it from this Wikipedia page. The discussion page has a removal request from Kelly's Nonbovine Ruminations blog. Miller's blog is still listed (see link "87")

[CharlotteWebb]

The discussion page has a removal request from Kelly's Nonbovine Ruminations blog.

Well yes unless I'm missing something it does seem outrageous that one would consider Kelly's blog more offensive than David's. I shouldn't be surprised though.

This post has been edited by CharlotteWebb:

[Random832]

The discussion page has a removal request from Kelly's Nonbovine Ruminations blog.

Well yes unless I'm missing something it does seem outrageous that one would consider Kelly's blog more offensive than David's. I shouldn't be surprised though.

If you'd read the request, you'd have noticed that it was not on the basis of being offensive, but on the basis of not being wikimedia-related - and, indeed, except for a few "Image via Wikimedia Commons", there is no mention of anything "wiki" at all in seven pages of archives.

And what's missing from this picture? Kindness, consideration, decency.

To be fair, libeling a publication by claiming that something said on the record in an interview was a fabrication doesn't show a lot of kindness, consideration, or decency, either.

[Alison]

And what's missing from this picture? Kindness, consideration, decency.

To be fair, libeling a publication by claiming that something said on the record in an interview was a fabrication doesn't show a lot of kindness, consideration, or decency, either.

That's true, but there's the matter of two wrongs an' all that ...

(and the 'fabrication' was her own, according to herself)