Shankbone vs. Kohs, part deux Options

[A Horse With No Name]

Our favorite evil queen is back in a new tsk-tsk against the beloved Mr. Kohs:

http://blog.shankbone.org/2009/04/14/greg-...edia-dramatica/

Kohs, take it from this horse's mouth -- Mr. Miller ain't good enough to flush your toilet!

[The Adversary]

I don´t really want to start a new thread, "Shankbone vs. Alison", so I post it here:
Shankers have been trolling Alisons talkpage, claiming his innocence in posting pictures of Palestinian kids with toy guns; he claims he only put that picture on the "Toy gun" article.
Not true.
On Christmas eve (no less) he put the picture of the boy with the toy gun into the "Nazareth" article see here.
An editor who, if we are to believe her user-page, actually lives in Nazareth, angrily removes the picture, with the edit line removing image of boy with toy gun and restoring image of souvenir shop - what the hell kind of POV photo is that exactly Shankbone?

Shankbone has also been low-level edit-warring over at Children and minors in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, trying to insert the same picture there. And again. (With help from User:Canadian Monkey.)

And why I have spend 5 minutes of my life on this, I really don´t know (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/confused.gif)

Yeah; let´s move on.

[Alison]

And why I have spend 5 minutes of my life on this, I really don´t know (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/confused.gif)

Yeah; let´s move on.

Yeah, I've been ignoring the guy and his nonsense. No sense in feeding him & besides, I've much better things to do in RL (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/bored.gif)

What he doesn't realize re. Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez is that I became involved with her article as a result of a distraught message relating to oversight. While I cannot discuss the details of course, and it didn't fall under Oversight remit, but I did my best at the time to limit the damage that David had been doing with her BLP on Wikipedia. He's pretty-much had it in for me since then. Ms. Valdes-Rodriguez was concerned at the time that he was beginning to obsess with her. Needless to say, Mr. Shankbone is totally unaware of the oversight background to this, nor of the subject's pleas. This was last February or thereabouts. It's all in the edit history.

She said on her blog at the time;

I stupid[ly] set about trying to rid Wikipedia of the sexuality stuff, in hopes of minimizing the very real danger to me and my family at the hands of these obsessed and dangerous detractors. It only made the issue bigger, in particular because a man named David Shankbone, who is a self-proclaimed editor at Wikipedia (and frustrated writer) became obsessed with me too.

This is the kind of stuff that Mr. Shankbone thinks is okay to place, unsourced*, into someone's BLP, and explicitly against their wishes. Folks already know all this. And what's missing from this picture? Kindness, consideration, decency.

BTW - he's back messing about with Seth Finkelstein again. Why??? (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/yecch.gif)

(* yes, unsourced. The 'sources' cited were utterly unacceptable)

[Cedric]

BTW - he's back messing about with Seth Finkelstein again. Why??? (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/yecch.gif)

Hmmmm. It looks as though User:Seth Finkelstein and his "on wiki" contributions got "wished into the cornfield". How very convenient for Slim Shanky. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/angry.gif)