QUOTE(One @ Sat 16th May 2009, 12:49pm)
I didn't miss it. As I said above, we implicitly found his conduct within permissible bounds for an admin, but not for the higher standard we expect of CUs.
You just said, and I quote, "
we would desysop an admin for prolific edit warring even if they never misused the tools." The Arbitration Committee just unanimously found that, and I quote, "
Jayjg has engaged in repeated and extensive edit-warring."
Is there some difference between "prolific edit warring" and "repeated and extensive edit warring" that I've missed?