QUOTE(Alex @ Fri 22nd May 2009, 8:25pm)
He's now
identified. Not that that means much though.
Anybody who's on Arbcom who hasn't publicly id'ed themselves is probably hiding something. Does anybody doubt that people are editing WP to push the POVs of outside entities?
That one or more these types has gotten elected to arbcom should be no surprise, especially when pseudos are the norm.
The solutions? Simple: requiring people in positions of trust to disclose identities and conflicts of interest. This isn't rocket science, folks.
I'll be very surprised if only one of the non-ided arbs has a hidden agenda....
QUOTE(Alex @ Fri 22nd May 2009, 8:25pm)
He's now
identified. Not that that means much though.
If the WMF foundation thinks that saying "we know who this is" is going to solve this problem, they're hopelessly naïve...