Apologies if this has already noted on this long thread, but am I really seeing this:
QUOTE
01:14, 15 February 2006 Fys (talk | contribs) unblocked "Dbiv (talk | contribs)" ‎ (Yes, I know I am not supposed to do this. Justification 1: Block was wrongly applied. Justification 2: I have a major edit which I am not going to lose come what may. WP:IAR applies)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&page=User:Dbiv He unblocks himself with his sockpuppet?
And this is even worse:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=67491586Dbiv unblocks himself as Dbiv.
QUOTE
Dbiv abuses his admin tools
5) After being blocked for a nonexistent 3RR violation, Dbiv used his administrator status to unblock his own account[6], an explicit violation of the blocking policy. During the course of an edit war with Irishpunktom on Peter Tatchell, Dbiv reverted to his preferred version[7] and then protected the article[8], an explicit violation of the protection policy. During the course of his long-term edit war with Irishpunktom, Dbiv has consistently used his administrative rollback tool to revert Irishpunktom's and others' non-vandalism, good faith content edits.[9]
Support:
Dmcdevit·t 03:52, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Fred Bauder 17:54, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
James F. (talk) 08:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
SimonP 21:31, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Mindspillage (spill yours?) 22:40, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 01:51, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
➥the Epopt 18:13, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Neutralitytalk 19:03, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:
This post has been edited by Peter Damian: