Our young Filipino chess guy who runs Yahoo! Answers and will show me
no mercy ("My fellow Wikipedians, we should go for a war against Wikipedia Review. Prepare for glory!"), has decided to weigh in on the Paid Editing discussion.
His
own quote is self-contradictory:
QUOTE
Anyone who would advertise paid editing of Wikipedia would lead the project into corruption. Why pay someone else if you can do it yourself? Wikipedia is open for everyone, without distinctions of any kind and without limitations in any manner.
Okay, so then why are you against the "everyone" that includes paid editors? Do you have any concept of what "without distinctions of any kind and without limitations in any manner" actually means?
Silly, ignorant teenager... so typical of the thought leadership at Wikipedia.