QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Tue 14th July 2009, 10:42am)
Having read the
earlier letter, I was struck by the helpful tone.
What is absolutely disgraceful is that the NPG is quite willing to let its efforts be used for free in a suitable form, but Wikipedia wants more and steals it.
The freedophiles would do well to read the simple examples which make it clear that the NPG are not being unreasonable and not seeking to keep public domain information out of the public domain.
What a bunch of tossers. (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/wtf.gif)
I too, was struck by the helpful tone - it seems the foundation is behaving in an arrogant fashion and unprepared to reach a compromise.
Giano
This post has been edited by Giano: