QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Tue 14th July 2009, 1:14am)
QUOTE(Kato @ Mon 13th July 2009, 7:06pm)
In light of this business, the National Portrait Gallery have taken their high resolution pictures off their website, I gather.
Correct. That happened in April according to Mr. Coetzee. But look at
this (completely random) example. How could this "low res" image not be suitable for any encyclopedic use?
That is a fair question. Just because editors in the US
can (we think) post super-high res versions doesn't necessarily mean we
should.