QUOTE(One @ Thu 16th July 2009, 10:30am)
QUOTE(LaraLove @ Thu 16th July 2009, 3:15am)
QUOTE(One @ Wed 15th July 2009, 10:49pm)
<snip>
The Wiki's plan can work without one BLP, and it can even work without giving unaccountable users the opportunity to mar BLPs, templates, or even Rootology's talk page.
What vandalism are you speaking of on Root's talk page?
Don't get me wrong, now. I couldn't give a shit if his page is protected, but your argument here is flawed. It was preemptive protection.
I don't believe I was making an argument, so I don't doubt it's flawed. I was making fun of what I call open editing fundamentalists. The Wiki will survive without IPs editing some articles, templates, and even a semi-active admin's talk page.
<snip>
Preemptive article protection might discourage new contributors in high-traffic areas, but any IP address posting on his talk page during JoshuaZ-Rootology drama is unlikely to be a newbie. As a wise woman said, "
The WR IP contribs never help any given situation."
If you weren't making an argument, what were you making with that wall of text?
I already pointed out that I couldn't give a shit if his page is protected. I was simply noting that your
whatever was flawed, because you mentioned vandalism where there wasn't any.