Takin' Out the Trash: My First Two Scalps, My Crusade Against Porn Fan-Boi Spam at Wikipedia Options

[KevinOKeeffe]

Over the last week (and for the foreseeable future), I've been devoting a lot of energy to ridding Wikipedia of even a small portion of its enormous over-coverage of topics related to the adult entertainment, ahem, "industry." Earlier today, my efforts yielded their first fruit. I have succeeded in securing the Deletion of two decidedly non-notable adult entertainment performers. Hopefully, I will soon be able to report additional victories in this regard. In the meantime, here are my first two scalps:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veronica_Caine

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaura_Eden

[Somey]

Golly!

Well, if it is him, at least he doesn't seem to be singling out Jewish porn actresses. That might tend to suggest he's grown up a bit in the last ten years or so...

[KevinOKeeffe]

Golly!

Well, if it is him, at least he doesn't seem to be singling out Jewish porn actresses. That might tend to suggest he's grown up a bit in the last ten years or so...

What can I say? During the 1990s, I was a pretty disturbed guy, due at least in part to a lifelong, untreated case of Bipolar Disorder, and I did a stupid, fucked-up thing. While I may adhere to a number of controversial socio-political notions (although there's probably more of Ignatius J. Riley in me than Julius Streicher), I do not actually hate people based solely on their membership in a particular racial, ethnic, and/or religious class. And like many people, that has not always been true about me. Unlike most other people who used to hate people on the basis of such criteria, I have the unfortunate burden of an evidentiary paper trail, cataloging my past foolishness in the local newspapers. Whereas most people simply have the luxury of lying about their past idiocy, if they are so inclined. And while I no longer hate people for being Jewish, I did not subsequently decide it was a good idea to become an adherent to orthodox socio-political thought. When I became a National Socialist ("Nazi") in 1996, I did so because of my awareness that this society is on an extremely deleterious trajectory. I don't think that has changed; we are still plunging towards an abyss. I simply don't think targeting people on the basis of their demographic make-up is a very good way to avert the disasters which surely await the USA in the decades to come, if our national trajectory is not altered.

[GlassBeadGame]

Golly!

Well, if it is him, at least he doesn't seem to be singling out Jewish porn actresses. That might tend to suggest he's grown up a bit in the last ten years or so...

What can I say? During the 1990s, I was a pretty disturbed guy, due at least in part to a lifelong, untreated case of Bipolar Disorder, and I did a stupid, fucked-up thing. While I may adhere to a number of controversial socio-political notions (although there's probably more of Ignatius J. Riley in me than Julius Streicher), I do not actually hate people based solely on their membership in a particular racial, ethnic, and/or religious class. And like many people, that has not always been true about me. Unlike most other people who used to hate people on the basis of such criteria, I have the unfortunate burden of an evidentiary paper trail, cataloging my past foolishness in the local newspapers. Whereas most people simply have the luxury of lying about their past idiocy, if they are so inclined. And while I no longer hate people for being Jewish, I did not subsequently decide it was a good idea to become an adherent to orthodox socio-political thought. When I became a National Socialist ("Nazi") in 1996, I did so because of my awareness that this society is on an extremely deleterious trajectory. I don't think that has changed; we are still plunging towards an abyss. I simply don't think targeting people on the basis of their demographic make-up is a very good way to avert the disasters which surely await the USA in the decades to come, if our national trajectory is not altered.

Your hate directed toward the JCC was 1999 and at that time you immediately tried to tender an "apology" which your victims found self-serving and insincere. Maybe not so much has changed.

[KevinOKeeffe]

Your hate directed toward the JCC was 1999 and at that time you immediately tried to tender an "apology" which your victims found self-serving and insincere. Maybe not so much has changed.

You are mistaken. I never issued any apology to the Albert L. Schultz Jewish Community Center in Palo Alto, California. After they called a public rally, complete with Joan Baez publicly denouncing me, I deemed our accounts in balance.

In any event, I have been repeatedly denounced for refusing to embrace White Nationalism, by people who's opinions are of more interest to me than yours (by simple virtue of the fact that I am much better acquainted with them), even if I do remain a radical rightist on various issues on socio-political controversy. In our society, many former neo-Nazis and the like suddenly turn 180 degrees and become liberals. I leave it to the reader to decide which is more likely to be sincere, the former neo-Nazi who wakes up one day and declares "Multiculturalism is actually a GREAT idea!," or the one who has simply altered his worldview to some significant extent over the passage of years, but remains an adherent to opinions still deemed unfashionable by the dominant majority.

Nobody responded to my suggestion

Why was this do you think?

The overwhelming evidence is that most people on the planet are not particularly motivated to think very deeply about much of anything, let alone write a brief essay on a subject of intellectual depth.

It's so much easier just to glide past these things, or blithely dismiss the thoughtful work of others as incomprehensible nonsense or utter bollocks.

Well, for the record, I've never read Don Quixote, and thus wasn't under the impression my opinions about it would contain any great insight.

[GlassBeadGame]

Your hate directed toward the JCC was 1999 and at that time you immediately tried to tender an "apology" which your victims found self-serving and insincere. Maybe not so much has changed.

You are mistaken. I never issued any apology to the Albert L. Schultz Jewish Community Center in Palo Alto, California. After they called a public rally, complete with Joan Baez publicly denouncing me, I deemed our accounts in balance.

In any event, I have been repeatedly denounced for refusing to embrace White Nationalism, by people who's opinions are of more interest to me than yours (by simple virtue of the fact that I am much better acquainted with them), even if I do remain a radical rightist on various issues on socio-political controversy. In our society, many former neo-Nazis and the like suddenly turn 180 degrees and become liberals. I leave it to the reader to decide which is more likely to be sincere, the former neo-Nazi who wakes up one day and declares "Multiculturalism is actually a GREAT idea!," or the one who has simply altered his worldview to some significant extent over the passage of years, but remains an adherent to opinions still deemed unfashionable by the dominant majority.

I hate to interrupt this episode of Get to Know a Fascist but I guess that liberal media had it wrong:

Blovad dismissed O'Keefe's televised apology last week as a farce.

``He was naive enough to say he didn't hurt anyone,'' Blovad said. ``The psychological damage to our community has been immense. People are concerned, worried especially with this happening right after the shootings at the Los Angeles Jewish Community Center. We can't go along thinking, `This can't happen here' anymore.' ''

It sure can be hard out there with bullies like Joan Baez and the MSM. Did Miss Baez take your lunch money too?

By the way if you're "repeatedly denounced for refusing to embrace White Nationalism" you might be hanging out with some unpleasant folks. Funny thing is that it is Wikipedia's brand of right wing libertarianism that gives you cover and space to operate on WP. Most people there will never call you on your nutter nonsense. I know your a different kind of right wing nutcase but don't call them leftists.

[KevinOKeeffe]

I hate to interrupt this episode of Get to Know a Fascist but I guess that liberal media had it wrong

Yes, apparently they did. It'd hardly be the first time. They can characterize some remarks I made to a local television reporter as "an apology," but that doesn't make it so.

It sure can be hard out there with bullies like Joan Baez and the MSM. Did Miss Baez take your lunch money too?

As a matter of fact, yes. And I want my $2.25 back!

[GlassBeadGame]

I hate to interrupt this episode of Get to Know a Fascist but I guess that liberal media had it wrong

Yes, apparently they did. It'd hardly be the first time. They can characterize some remarks I made to a local television reporter as "an apology," but that doesn't make it so.

It sure can be hard out there with bullies like Joan Baez and the MSM. Did Miss Baez take your lunch money too?

As a matter of fact, yes. And I want my $2.25 back!

My point is that your "untreated bi-polar illness" is nonsense to free you from the responsibilities of your actions and the stigma of getting caught. You maintain the same ideology while trying to clean up your image by denying the most repugnant aspects. But your saying "my illness made me do it" now shows the same pattern of insincere "change" evidenced by your "apology" then.

What I am saying is that when you say you have changed you are lying. Who knows what you might still be willing to do in darkness when you don't think you'd get caught?

[KevinOKeeffe]

My point is that your "untreated bi-polar illness" is nonsense to free you from the responsibilities of your actions and the stigma of getting caught. You maintain the same ideology while trying to clean up your image by denying the most repugnant aspects. But your saying "my illness made me do it" now shows the same pattern of insincere "change" evidenced by your "apology" then.

What I am saying is that when you say you have changed you are lying. Who knows what you might still be willing to do in darkness when you don't think you'd get caught?

Kevin Riley O'Keeffe: So anti-Semitic he once shot a man just for being circumcised!

Anyway, I'll take you seriously right after I see some evidence you hound far-leftists for the tens of millions slaughtered in the Gulag. Until then, its just more of the usual "those-guys-are-really-bad-'cause-they're-on-the-right-and-people-on-the-right-are-big-meanies!" schtick that has become so cliched in recent decades. History is a rough game. If you want to pretend the European far-right of the 1930s & 40s represents the ultimate in evil, and that people associated with that ideological tendency in years past (yet secretly, in their hearts, they retain their fidelity to the Swastika!) constitute some particular faction of significance that you are obligated to challenge wherever you find it, by all means, enjoy your LARPing. We can even pretend you shot me with a bazooka. Check it out! "Argh! You got me! Now fascism will not prevail!"

Are we done, by any chance? Or do you want to talk about my past some more?

Over the last week (and for the foreseeable future)...

And Wikipedia ensnares yet another victim...

As I said... Are you paying attention, Kevin?

I believe you're trying to be helpful, but I'm not certain I understand your point. You still edit Wikipedia too, right?

[grievous]

I believe you're trying to be helpful, but I'm not certain I understand your point. You still edit Wikipedia too, right?

I'm sure he does. But he doesn't do it to go on a personal crusade to rid Wikipedia of the "scum and villany" of its biographies of adult film actresses.

But, hey, if it distracts you from your normal activities of fire-bombing jewish centers, more power to you.

[KevinOKeeffe]

I believe you're trying to be helpful, but I'm not certain I understand your point. You still edit Wikipedia too, right?

I'm sure he does. But he doesn't do it to go on a personal crusade to rid Wikipedia of the "scum and villany" of its biographies of adult film actresses.

A shame. Perhaps he should.

Of course, I do a lot of other things on Wikipedia as well (I've been active there since January of 2005; my anti-porn "crusade" began about two weeks ago). For example, I'm presently doing these really cool Electoral History sections for all of California's Congressional delegation (including their runs for other offices). In the last week or so, I have thus far completed them for all the California Congressional representatives from Districts 1-11 (minus Ellen Tauscher in District 10; someone beat me to it), plus Mike Honda in District 15 (perhaps not suprisingly, I began with my own Congressman).

The ones for Tom McClintock, Dan Lungren, and Nancy Pelosi were really kind of a bitch. Just on that project, I've added around 200KB of content to Wikipedia in about the last week. If you think I'm just PRODing porn spam articles, think again. Although I most assuredly am doing that as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_McClintoc...ectoral_History

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Lungren#Electoral_History

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_his...cy_Pelosi#Races

But, hey, if it distracts you from your normal activities of fire-bombing jewish centers, more power to you.

Now now, let us not go making up slanders! (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/thumbsdown.gif)

Well, perhaps you're trying to develop into a libertarian.

I used to be a libertarian, before my neo-Nazi phase. I was a Delegate representing Santa Clara County at the Libertarian Party state convention in Los Angeles, in 1994. These days, I wouldn't precisely characterize my views as "libertarian," yet that's about as close as the American political system comes to my personal take on things. I switched my registration from Democrat to Republican in December of 2007, in order to vote for Ron Paul in the California Republican Presidential primary (I had previously switched my registration from Republican to Democrat on March 17th, 2003, in order to protest the invasion of Iraq - I remember the date because it was St. Patrick's Day, as well as three days prior to the actual invasion on 3/20/03).

I think we can believe the veracity of somone who claims to have bi-polarism when the include they following statements in the same essay:

Since freedom of speech would seem to be part and parcel to the mission of the WikiMedia Foundation's various projects, I believe it is important for persons who adhere to unfashionable, tabu, far right socio-political doctrines, to be represented in the halls of power, as it were, within the WikiMedia milieu...In the event I am elected, I swear that I shall do my utmost to always be objective, and to always seek to promote ideological neutrality in a proactive manner.

(IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/rolleyes.gif)

I believe that was an entirely rational statement; Wikipedia already has an enormous bias to the mainstream left, so getting some people on the far-right into its halls of power, as it were, would help create a more ideologically-neutral environment.

... and all this has what, precisely, to do with Wikipedia?

Mr O'Keefe is running for a position as a WMF Trustee.

While there have been some rash speculations (and some outright cheap shots) in this thread, is it tarpit-worthy? After all, the information about O'Keefe's past actions and conviction are well documented and he has confirmed them.

In the event this thread is consigned to The Tarpit, could we possibly keep those posts here, that are actually on-topic? My "crusade" continues, you know, and I expect to have more favourable results to report shortly.