And another one bites the dust....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christina_AguchiI wasn't too happy with the result of another Nomination, however, particularly in light of the complete and total lack of Notability; if this person's article was not considered to lack notability, it is difficult to understand how
ANY adult film performer could be said to lack notability...which I suspect is rather the point. Fortunately, wiser heads prevailed in the case of Ms. Aguchi's article above, and thus the fight goes on....
Here's where Admin SoWhy screwed me, or more precisely, how he screwed over Wikipedia by allowing such crap to remain, over the objections of a democratic majority:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Art...2nd_nomination)My stalker neglected to dePROD another porn spam article I had PRODed (presumably, an oversight), so I was all set to announce a second victory, but just a few hours before the seven day deletion interval expired, some other goofball dePRODed it, and falsely claimed that her two AVN award nominations (both for 2009) established her at notable as per WP:Pornbio, however the WP:Pornbio criteria explicitly states that if an article's subject is relying on mere award nominations to demonstrate their notability, those nominations must occur in two or more years. I wonder if he was consciously lying, or just being an imbecile? False dichotomy, perhaps?