And now Crafty has been blocked for pointing out the obvious
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cra...#September_2009The ANI discussion is priceless
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...remain_namelessCrafty for some time was suspected of being Peter Damian for his 'absolute' and uncompromising statements. ("Honest" was perhaps the word they meant). Ikip comes across as a complete idiot.
I have for some time said that Skomorokh is one to watch.
QUOTE
Crafty, regardless of how right you feel you are, this is unneeded harassment of a good-faith contributor to the project. Please remove your comment immediately. Skomorokh 14:10, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Absolutely not. Benji is in violation of WP:COI. If he doesn't want his stuff revealed around the interwebs, he shouldn't write articles about himself on Wikipedia. Crafty (talk) 14:15, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Your argument has a strong ring of "women who wear revealing clothing and walk down dark alleys at night should expect to be harassed", as if that is a justification for doing the harassing oneself. That comment of yours is ugly and without benefit to the project, no matter how you want to shift the guilt. Skomorokh 14:22, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
And I respectfully acknowledge your comments. Nevertheless my position is unmoved. Crafty (talk) 14:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
I will consider the matter settled, then, barring the input of other editors. Ciao, Skomorokh 14:29, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Jolly decent of you. Sherry? (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) Crafty (talk) 14:34, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
If it were any other matter, I would be glad to join you, but I think it would be in rather poor taste considering you're left the chap swinging from the rafters, so to speak. Skomorokh 14:38, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
But if Crafty is right, how on earth can this be a good faith contributor to the project?
This post has been edited by Peter Damian: