QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Mon 7th September 2009, 4:30pm)
QUOTE
Endorse the blocks, for the record (do not think anyone would question them, actually... user seemed bound and determined to repeat behavior no matter how many times told to stop). ++Lar: t/c 19:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Surely not. My reading that he was very angry about the obvious injustice of this, and he should have been allowed to cool down. I know what it is like to be afflicted with a temper. An indef was cruel.
No, an indef is "until circumstances change". As long as Crafty vows to keep doing the same disallowed thing, there is no point in unblocking that account. And you know it, you're just working it for the LULZ. Whatev.
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Mon 7th September 2009, 4:36pm)
I'm just saying, leave it at 48 hours, or whatever, and see what happens.
Say it as Crafty, over there. Or not at all, unless this is "unblock request annex".
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Mon 7th September 2009, 4:59pm)
3. Why is Petey so interested in Benji?
He's not. He's interested in getting people interested in Crafty which is/isn't him/his sock. Or something.
QUOTE(Robert Roberts @ Mon 7th September 2009, 6:22pm)
To be honest, it seems to kick off after it was mentioned here.
A lot of stuff does these days.