QUOTE(Kato @ Fri 11th September 2009, 7:58am)
QUOTE(Appleby @ Fri 11th September 2009, 5:37am)
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Thu 10th September 2009, 10:55pm)
QUOTE(Kato @ Thu 10th September 2009, 2:36pm)
Will Beback created that list.
Actually, SlimVirgin created that list. It was one of her sooper-sekrit userpage projects that she would oversight whenever she wasn't working on it (this was a topic of discussion here at the Review at the time.) However, at a certain point, Will Beback took it up as his personal mission, and has added a host of new allegations.
SlimVirgin can't oversight.
I think he means deleting and then recreating. Slim used to delete and recreate such lists all the time.
QUOTE(Hell Freezes Over @ Fri 11th September 2009, 6:52am)
So now what can this mean, ED March 2009?
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php...ldid=1997978079 Note: "One time I actually attended a Wikipedia meetup in St. Petersburg, FL in character as a notorious vandal user." Point outed by One Who Watches on 172's talk page.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:172#A_ConspiracyIs this someone pretending to be someone who was pretending, or what? And who would have known in March 2009?
Wow. Now it's getting really weird. (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/hmmm.gif)
I need some time to digest these new developments.
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Fri 11th September 2009, 7:35am)
No LaRouche activist would say something like "Jew-controlled debt/monetary financial system." Although "One Who Watches" seems to be using a deliberately opaque mode of expression, my reading is that he is suggesting that 172 is impersonating a LaRouchista with malicious intent.
Not my immediate thought, but all bets are off at the moment. This is like freakin' Scooby Doo!
This long statement by "One Who Watches" is very strange.
QUOTE(One Who Watches)
What I will note is that some are saying this case of dual identity is unrealistic because they see Marxism and the ideology of Lyndon LaRouche as somehow polar opposites.
Who's saying that, exactly?
The dual identity is unrealistic because 172 was a dedicated Wikipedio who was eloquent, even while breaking every tenet Wikipedia professed to hold. Cognition, on the other hand, talked of "beast-men", and made a couple of silly spelling mistakes on his user page back in 2005.
The statement then goes on to make a few points about LaRouche
in a manner that looks familiar to me from discussions on this site. It's the usual fare. LaRouche is elevated from hopelessly misguided sufferer of pareidolia who demonizes all and sundry by adding Hitler moustaches to photos, to some sort of visionary "Economist" with no flies attached.
We're no closer to finding out the truth. But the two conspiracy options are gaining depth. These are either a blackhand 172 conspiracy possibly involving A Carr and other leading Wikipedios, or a LaRouchian conspiracy to get revenge on 172.
The statement ends with the enigmatic:
QUOTE(One Who Watches)
I doubt any of you observing this case understand at all what's actually happening.
This latest development leans more towards the LaRouchian revenge theory than the blackhand theory, despite Herschel's analysis above to the contrary. The statement is obviously written by a LaRouche supporter, and feels like misdirection.