QUOTE(Lar @ Sat 19th September 2009, 10:36pm)
I expect our ends are more congruent than you might expect. Our means just differ.
Then why aren't you doing something about the likes of Triplestop? Here he is, replacing the tag on the article.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=314965697He had a change of heart later, but the very fact there are people like that running the project is very disturbing.
Policy should change so that article quality takes priority over everything else. These 'experiments' of mine prove beyond all doubt that this is not the case.
Actually to your credit I see you are. By why hasn't this person been blocked or banned? He or she is no use to the project.
QUOTE
Regarding this G5 tagging. It's already been explained to you that the article is ineligible for G5 tagging. Your removal was prudent, but your edit summary is fallacious. No further edits by me or anyone else are required to make it ineligible for G5, all that is required is that some other editor takes responsibility. Which I have done, see the note at the talk page. That tagging of yours was a disruptive edit, and you are strongly advised not to do it again. Also, next time you template a regular, please have the courtesy to sign your work instead of expecting someone else to clean up after you. ++Lar: t/c 05:41, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
QUOTE
This is the hard part of G5. PD knows this. So he's going to sock and/or proxy to get "good" articles into wikipedia in order to show us all how wrong we were about banning him for being disputatious and unpleasant. Burn. with. fire. Protonk (talk) 21:55, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
QUOTE
I agree w/ NW. There is really no option here other than avoiding playing his games. Part of the reason he is banned is because he insisted on treating other people like this, placing them in seemingly implacable binds in order to fulfill his views about wikipedia. It's petty and fanatical and we are better off just going without it. If that means wikipedia has 1 less article on 13th century theologians so be it. Protonk (talk) 22:43, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Gasp.
This post has been edited by Peter Damian: