QUOTE(One @ Wed 30th September 2009, 8:02pm)
QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Thu 1st October 2009, 12:01am)
Well, Casliber's statement puts a new spin to it...
After thinking about it, I can't even say I'm disappointed in Casliber and/or Lara. They didn't do anything.. it was Undertow/Law who put them in a rough spot. I can empathize. Trust me.
For reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arb...y_from_CasliberIt is nice to see Arbcom members actively encouraging sockpuppetry by "banned" editors. If it is good enough for Casliber's friends, does that mean it is good enough for everyone? Or are there two different rules that Arbcom plays by? (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/dry.gif)
And, for the record, how many members of Arbcom knew about Law's history? And did Daniel, the Arbcom clerk, also know about it in advance?
This post has been edited by A Horse With No Name: