QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Thu 1st October 2009, 9:47am)
Oh, nice to see the Arbcom members like to gossip about "official" business. But, then again, it always seems like diner waitresses are the most well-informed people in any community. (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/happy.gif)
Of course, that doesn't answer the question, so I will ask it again: how many Arbcom members (including clerks) knew that Law was a sock of The Undertow? (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/ermm.gif)
I'm not a waitress anymore. I was doing that and restaurant management. Actions of my unethical boss with an apparent lack of understanding wrt nepotism compelled me to walk. I am nw among the unemployed full-time college students.
As for your question, I neither know nor care, Eco.
QUOTE(Deodand @ Thu 1st October 2009, 12:44pm)
@Lara: makes perfect sense, if you just include IRL threats. If, however, you base it partially on Law's threats to destroy his WP existence, as it were, which makes more sense? Keeping schtum or trying to put Law in a position where he doesn't have the authority to do good on his threats?
Okay, so disregarding the "IRL threats," taking only threats to ruin him on the project, what would he do? Ironholds made the first such threat. He got the ball rolling, Law took it and ran.