QUOTE(Grep @ Tue 13th October 2009, 5:07pm)
QUOTE(The Wales Hunter @ Tue 13th October 2009, 7:35pm)
Problem here - if Wikipedia/the WMF/whoever don't keep a track of these kind of books, does that mean an inaccurate Wikipedia article could become a book and the book could then become the source for the inaccuracy in the article? Etc, etc, etc.
Yes. This is precisely why Wikipedia is a danger to the whole foundation of human knowledge.
Well, any book that was recognized as being lifted from Wikipedia clearly wouldn't qualify as an RS. The devil's in the recognition, I'd say, though that doesn't seem to be a problem here.