QUOTE(Robert Roberts @ Mon 7th September 2009, 3:26pm)
I have no problems with paid editing *but* Benji has made a classic mistake, if you don't want to answer a question then don't answer it - the weasel way he phrases his answer screams "I am a paid editor!" regardless of what the truth actually is.
QUOTE
The simplest interpretation of these facts is that Benjiboi is writing gay porn advertisements on Wikipedia for pay.
Benjiboi, do you deny this? Do you have another interpretation of these facts? --- User:Smallbones 21:33, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
His Sisters page lists: "What is your occupation?
Writer" ... what business are HM Ltd. and RFPP in?
67.160.100.233 is, what, Seattle?
QUOTE
If you were invited by another country to be a citizen journalist it sure would seem exceptional, and then add interviewing (not seeing) the president by granted interview which itself was reported on by independent media. Yea, it might, or at least suggest this is an exceptional situation. -- Banjeboi 00:11, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Hold on ... was he "invited by another country to be a citizen journalist" or financed and introduced because he was part of a Fire Island daisy chain with the Israel Consulate's David Saranga?I mean, which came first?
Did David Shankbone get funded and the intro to Perez because he got David Saranga in on the Israeli hardcore gay porn king Michael Lucas's entertainment? Or did David Saranga get David Shankbones in on the Lucas Entertainment, inc after he financed his trip to Israeli? Who scratched whose back first?
Is hard core gay porn Michael Lucas's primary connection with the Israeli government's David Saranga or with the "leading Wikipedian" David Shankbone?I want a detailed "blow" by "blow" account. This would seem to be the ground the whole "notability" stands on. All very encyclopaediac indeed ... is Benjiboi just on a 'High Doe' about defending the Shankbone topic because he is part of the same gay porn scene turn tricks on the Pee-dia ... and by sucking up to Shankbone strengthen their collective position within the Pee-dian "community"?
I suspect we might read about all this in the San Francisco Spectrum Magazine.
QUOTE
Re: Benjiboi
It is one thing to argue with a stubborn editor, it is another to argue with an editor paid to be stubborn.
--TeaDrinker (talk) 14:09, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
This post has been edited by Cock-up-over-conspiracy: