QUOTE(Happy drinker @ Wed 21st October 2009, 12:32pm)
If an editor on Wikipedia threatened to assault another editor, he'd be banned on the spot, wouldn't he? There'd be ructions here if he wasn't, right? What's the policy here?
I suppose it depends on who, here, you are thinking of assaulting!The way I look at it, the kind of individuals you want on the project are those that are self-censoring.
Going to the wiki, IMHO, should be like going to work. If you slapped hardcore porn all around your booth, spent company expenses holidaying your pornstar girlfriend or used your position to push your politics ... you would lose your job, wouldn't you?
QUOTE(Somey @ Wed 21st October 2009, 6:54am)
Are you sure? That's one of the most hilarious things I've ever read in my whole life!
Ya gotta wonder about these people... Just when you think they can't get any more ludicrous, ridiculous, and laughable, they come up with stuff like this.
Yup, there is the original
on site. Lucas, who also posted a video of himself having
oral sex with doll baby and licking its (invisible) genitalia goes further ... you don't want to read
the rest. He has it in for Obama and is certainly playing the propaganda game. The Saranga/government connection raises questions as the Shankbone connection on the other side ought do for sincere Wikipedians.
There are 'some' ... right?QUOTE
Porn O'Phile
Despite his beauty, build, billions and big boner, Michael Lucas and I have something in common: our abiding adoration of men's pretty posterior pucker ... Lucas reappears in Scene 5 to seduce and anally amuse and abuse a burly, furry Texan named Ashland Stone (a producer of Viral Videos for Barack Obama). Lucas must like him, for he rims the dude after ...
So what we are doing here, again I take it, is going into microcosm and studying the values and milieu ... the nature of the font from which all this Wiki-wisdom, Pee-dia principles and flows.
Sensationalist media whores laughing as they see how far they can push boundaries surely?
The Pee-dia suffers from an institutional confusion of 'notoriety' with 'notability'.This post has been edited by Cock-up-over-conspiracy: