QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Thu 22nd October 2009, 4:10pm)
QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Thu 22nd October 2009, 1:20pm)
While trying to find the AN/I discussion on this latest bit of Shankboning, I got distracted by the gripping tale of poor
Nipple37Â
(T-C-L-K-R-D)
, who was apparently banned for having an overly lewd username.
Is there nothing that is incapable of frothing Wikipedians into a frenzy?
Hard to believe, but you're right.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=321252001Isn't
Orange MikeÂ
(T-C-L-K-R-D)
a sweetie? I think we've heard of him here on WR, no?
It appears that the reapl problem in this situatin is
Rschen7754Â
(T-C-L-K-R-D)
, who is apparently unwilling to back down from the hard rule that "no username may have 'nipple' in it", and doesn't believe in communicating. The 'community' (that is, the dramawhores at ANI) are apparently satisfied by his statement that he'll "stay away from UAA for a while".
This is an example of someone who should not be an admin. That Wikipedia cannot see this is yet more proof of their fundamental stupidity.
I strongly urge people to create accounts containing the name "Nipple" just to make Rschen twitch.
QUOTE(Lar @ Thu 22nd October 2009, 6:34pm)
As a personal observation, you're not off to a very good start credibility-wise.
It's really hard to build up much credibility when you're stuck with living under a bridge.