QUOTE(Jaranda @ Tue 10th November 2009, 9:40am)
So far a slow start for nominations compared to last year, one user who I'm not familar with his work (Fritzpoll), and another who's just trolling that page and I highly recomend he withdraw(Kmweber).
Who is
ChutznikÂ
(T-C-L-K-R-D)
? His or her platform has these attractive features:
QUOTE
When in doubt, desysop an administrator. If doubt exists whether an admin retains the community's trust, the default should be to desysop and refer back to the community. I see no distinction between "desysop" and "require a reconfirmation vote."
When in doubt, do not ban users, and unban those who sincerely request it. If we are serious that "anyone can edit" this encyclopedia, we must stop handing out bans like candy. ArbCom has trended toward topic-bans instead of site-bans where possible, but it can go further. Durova's Wikipedia:Standard offer would guide my approach. If a user can and wants to improve the encyclopedia, we should grant them a legitimate return.
Edit: Oho,
Chutznik has, as they say, a past:
QUOTE
I have alternatively "retired" or had indef-blocked five accounts with 100 or more edits (Placeholder account, Shalom, Buki ben Yogli, Crystal whacker, Kivel).
We also have him saying in reply to Iridescent,
QUOTE
I never posted death threats against you on WR, as you claim.