QUOTE(everyking @ Thu 19th November 2009, 3:52am)
I wouldn't vote for any of these candidates so far. Any candidate who wants to secure my vote should state that they will conduct all of their ArbCom-related discussions on-wiki, not on the mailing list, unless private information is involved. (That doesn't apply to a few current and former arbitrators such as Bauder and Kirill--my opinion of them is already so low that they could do nothing to redeem themselves.)
Actually, as part of my candidacy I promise to do something like that: see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AGK/PlatformQUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Thu 19th November 2009, 7:20pm)
I know RHMED is trying to be funny on purpose -- are the other guys
really serious?
I like the addition of the audio recording "A Conversation with Jehochman"...oh, brother, if this is any evidence, then it seems like anyone with a pulse can get a Yale degree. (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/wacko.gif)
There's no need to denigrate him. I actually thought he was well-informed about every aspect of the project that Privatemusings brought up.
And if by "serious" you mean that we are running with the aim of doing a good job and that we hope to be elected, then yes, I think most of us are. I certainly am.
(I'm aware that I am mostly responding to stuff that most would ignore (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif).)