QUOTE(AGK @ Thu 19th November 2009, 2:39pm)
There's no need to denigrate him.
I know, but I'm not getting paid to write this stuff. If you want a happy horse, slip some moolah in my feedbag and I'll compose sonnets of praise. (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/unhappy.gif)
QUOTE(AGK @ Thu 19th November 2009, 2:39pm)
And if by "serious" you mean that we are running with the aim of doing a good job and that we hope to be elected, then yes, I think most of us are. I certainly am.
Okay, but I am confused about this campaign promise of yours:
"If the community brings a problematic administrator to the committee whilst I am sitting on it, I will vote to launch proceedings to scrutinise the administrator—and will support only measures which fully neutralise the problems with that administrator."
Now I don't understand three things:
1. What are you sitting on, the administrator or the committee? If you are sitting on the administrator, how much do you weigh? And if you are very heavy and have to sit on someone who is rail thin, like MZMcBride, do you think that such behavior by yourself is safe? I mean, we have five million law school students and five million eight-year-olds on Wikipedia, but I don't think there is any physician in the ranks.
2. How do you plan to "scrutinise the administrator"? Do you have to buy latex gloves? Or will a feather duster do? And would you consider wearing a French maid's costume if you had to use a feather duster?
3. How do you plan to "fully neutralise the problems with that administrator"? Will you personally use blunt instruments or hand-to-hand combat, or do you plan to outsource the task to the administrators at the Wiki Cosa Nostra?