QUOTE(trenton @ Sun 22nd November 2009, 10:51pm)
Shelly, Jehochman (to a lesser extant), and particularly AGK are just grandstanding before the arbcom election.
I could tell AGK was going to run for the arbcom election when he switched from obsequious arbcom clerk mode to arbcom critic mode
here.
I toe the line, and I get opposed for not being free-thinking. I actually speak my mind, and I get called a grand-stander. There really is no satisfying people, is there?
I stand by my comments there. Remedies like that are useless. I'm hardly grandstanding by making a comment on a case discussion page: it's not like they receive a lot of attention, is it? (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif)
QUOTE(Mathsci @ Sun 22nd November 2009, 7:31am)
On the other hand Manning did not warn his other fellow clerk AGK for inflammatory language on the case pages. Instead he wrote a glowing endorsement of AGK for the elections.
Oh, hush you. I did not use "inflammatory language." Strong criticism of a proposed committee decision is a quite different thing. I also explained myself quite extensively on the same page where Manning offered his endorsement.
This post has been edited by AGK: