Group: Regulars
Posts: 671
Joined:
Member No.: 10,962
Looking at the current list of CheckUsers, it looks pretty clean to me at this point. Might be nice to remove one or two people for inactivity, but most the problematic old guard seems to have been removed.
I want to stare at the seaside and do nothing at all
Group: Regulars
Posts: 635
Joined:
Member No.: 1,010
QUOTE(MZMcBride @ Sun 29th November 2009, 8:27pm)
Looking at the current list of CheckUsers, it looks pretty clean to me at this point. Might be nice to remove one or two people for inactivity, but most the problematic old guard seems to have been removed.
One of Dominic's platform items in the Audit subcommittee election was removal of privileges for inactivity.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 478
Joined:
Member No.: 5,693
QUOTE(No one of consequence @ Mon 30th November 2009, 3:20am)
QUOTE(MZMcBride @ Sun 29th November 2009, 8:27pm)
Looking at the current list of CheckUsers, it looks pretty clean to me at this point. Might be nice to remove one or two people for inactivity, but most the problematic old guard seems to have been removed.
One of Dominic's platform items in the Audit subcommittee election was removal of privileges for inactivity.
I want to stare at the seaside and do nothing at all
Group: Regulars
Posts: 635
Joined:
Member No.: 1,010
QUOTE(MBisanz @ Mon 30th November 2009, 2:29am)
QUOTE(No one of consequence @ Mon 30th November 2009, 3:20am)
QUOTE(MZMcBride @ Sun 29th November 2009, 8:27pm)
Looking at the current list of CheckUsers, it looks pretty clean to me at this point. Might be nice to remove one or two people for inactivity, but most the problematic old guard seems to have been removed.
One of Dominic's platform items in the Audit subcommittee election was removal of privileges for inactivity.
VOA is the developer who coded most of the CU interface. I don't know if he still works on the code at all, but that would obviously not show up in the log. There are a few people on that list, Stewards and other WMF office folk, who rarely use the tool, but who, realistically, are not going to have it removed by Arbcom for lack of activity. I suppose Jimbo fits in this category, heaven knows why.