QUOTE(radek @ Sun 6th December 2009, 3:49am)
QUOTE(Guesswork Orange @ Sat 5th December 2009, 11:06am)
The new information leak (Radek wanted to copy'n'paste an email of the banned user Molobo to Wikipedia, but had copied too much) showed not only Radeksz's recent off-wiki continuation but revealed a part of his GTalk buddylist.
Obviously Radek has at least Biophys, Dc76, Digwuren, Durova, Martintg and Molobo in his GTalk contact list, unsurprisingly all of them involved in the EEML arbitration case. Those who thought that the mailing list was the only channel apparently have forgotten that it is about a network of collusion regardless of the form of secret communication. Instant messenger is the favorite channel of the EEML because it allows much faster response times for coordination, especially during revert wars to trap their opponents in the 24-hour period.
My GTalk sidebar automatically adds people that I've emailed in the past to it. Durova is not "involved" in EEML case. I havent heard from Biophys in a very long time (basically since the case started). I had some limited communications with the others mostly sending each other notifications like "so-and-so just voted". Molobo's different but there's nothing wrong there either
Anyway - I posted all the email headers at the case page, after removing the personal info. Here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Eastern_European_mailing_list/Proposed_decision#Relevant_portions_of_the_oversighted_edit]. So everyone can see the reasons for why Coren apparently's proposing 1 year blocks.
Since all that is now in the open I'm still waiting for MBizans to step up and back up his slander - or admit that his bluff was called or at very least back off and admit to the fact that he misunderstood a language he doesn't speak and just jumped to conclusions.
Also Guesswork, you'll forgive me if from now on I'll ignore your trolling. There's enough of that at the ArbCom page which despite some very honest and good work by the clerks is pretty much an all-you-can-eat buffet for the trolls.
Well I was going to be nice and hope this thread would die so you would only have to fight the issue out on WP where there is a greater assumption of good faith required, but, here are the subject lines I took to indicate as targeting against the arbs and arb candidates per your post #182 permission:
*[WPM] The Committee can be nice‎ - [name removed] wrote: > NYBrada. Wyslalem mejla do kazdego z supporta poza FloNight. Ciekawe, czy …
*[Fwd: [WPM] Manning vanishing?]‎ - Original Message Subject: [WPM] Manning vanishing? Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:31:08 EST …
*What to watch‎ - Well, I thought about it - and I think most main articles will be safe because there's non …
*[WPM] The perils of enthusiasm‎ - According to FloNight, enthusiasm is punishable: <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title …
*[WPM] Lessons from the WikiCup saga‎ - On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 22:41, [name removed] <[email address removed> wrote: Anyway, check the …
*[WPM] ArbCom case‎ - On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 16:50, [name removed] <[email removed]> wrote: Imagine …
*[WPM] Thinking I might ask Jehochman a question‎ - [username removed] already asked him similar question: * support reading the private emails (he hasn't …
*Re: [WPM] ArbCom case‎ - Anyway, it works only for [three usernames removed]. So, these 3 people should decide for …
*[WPM] FloNight shows her true colors‎ -
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...Requests%2FCase …
*[WPM] Coren running again for the arbitrator seat‎ - Per
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arb...s_December_2009 …
*Vassayna‎ - [name removed] wrote: > He just voted. Against me, but for [two usernames removed] and split it on …
*[Fwd: Re: Wikipedia: question about possible CoI and recusal]‎ - Well I dont think you can do anything about it now. The thing of course is that new proposals may …
*[WPM] What next?‎ - [name removed] wrote: > Quick question - if an arb is recused from this case, would they also be …
*[WPM] A potentially interesting form of legal threat‎ - At 04:43 PM 11/12/2009, [name removed] wrote: >Anyway, legal wise, we have one strong …
*[WPM] Jehochman's campaign‎ - In a message dated 11/14/2009 6:28:42 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [email removed] writes: By …