QUOTE(the fieryangel @ Thu 10th December 2009, 6:51am)
Here's an interesting IP which hasn't been nailed yet: its last three edits insert Mark Binmore references into two different articles. Apparently Mark has been an interviewer for Pink TV, Europe's second gay satellite channel.
Sorry,
got that one already... (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/tongue.gif)
QUOTE
I found this in the search results, which is pretty...ironic :
QUOTE
Entertainment News, PinkNews.co.uk Gay News (UK and world) from ...
Ron Livingston is suing over the edits (Photo: Mark Binmore) ...(snip)
So,
what does this tell us?Earlier I
theorized that the photo, or the act of taking it, might have had something to do with Binmore's later behavior - i.e., if Livingston was rude to Binmore at that particular moment, Binmore might have decided to start his campaign as a form of revenge. In his mind he would have felt
betrayed, in that Livingston had failed to properly appreciate his adulation of him or his attraction towards him. I'd say it's pretty obvious that the attraction began with Binmore's viewing the episodes of
Sex and the City that Livingston appeared in - if Livingston hadn't taken that role, none of this would have happened.