![]() |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
carbuncle |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Fat Cat ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 1,601 Joined: Member No.: 5,544 ![]() |
I guess it was inevitable. Please enjoy this really, really lame piece of soft-core porn Wikipedia fan fiction:
QUOTE "M-Mr. Wales? You wanted to see me?" Her words jolted me from my trance and I immediately returned to presence. "Oh, ah... I did want to see you," I nervously stumbled over my words. "I mean ah, well, yes. I wanted to see you - I mean speak to you." She smiled at my nervous attempt to speak, but I knew she was just as nervous as I was. "I mean... I mean call me Jimbo. Jimbo Wales. You don't need to call me Mr. Wales." She smiled serenely again, a lock of her blue hair falling over her eye. She gently brushed it back into place. Clearly the author hasn't seen those text messages allegedly sent by Jimbo to the completely sane and not crazy at all Rachel Marsden. |
![]() ![]() |
The Wales Hunter |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Hackenslasher ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 869 Joined: Member No.: 4,319 ![]() |
|
thekohser |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 10,274 Joined: Member No.: 911 ![]() |
I've just sent Jimbo another e-mail regarding "the rest of the library". That page will likely soon be down, too. We have to remember, this is the guy who, when faced with a threatened boycott of his advertisers on a "Spanking Art" wiki that glorified child abuse, got his feathers ruffled because the "proper channels" for complaining about the site weren't exercised. Anyway, at the bottom of Uncyclopedia, I see this ad for Lostpedia. We really do have to wonder if maybe Jimbo doesn't "deserve" at least some of this sexualized garbage following him around. |
Doc glasgow |
![]()
Post
#4
|
Wikipedia:The Sump of All Human Knowledge ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 1,138 Joined: From: at home Member No.: 90 ![]() |
I've just sent Jimbo another e-mail regarding "the rest of the library". That page will likely soon be down, too. We have to remember, this is the guy who, when faced with a threatened boycott of his advertisers on a "Spanking Art" wiki that glorified child abuse, got his feathers ruffled because the "proper channels" for complaining about the site weren't exercised. Anyway, at the bottom of Uncyclopedia, I see this ad for Lostpedia. We really do have to wonder if maybe Jimbo doesn't "deserve" at least some of this sexualized garbage following him around. There is a very serious question of the total failure of Wikimedia and Wikia to take moral responsibility for their content and have realistic child protection policies, and zero tolerance towards contributors who seek to push the bounds. That's a good thing for this site to highlight. However, let's not confuse that with Jimbo's allegedly slightly sleezy sexual reputation, which should be of no interest to us whatsoever. This thread has the possibility to bring out both the best and most useful critique that WR can provide, and the worst type of salacious nonsense. |
thekohser |
![]()
Post
#5
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 10,274 Joined: Member No.: 911 ![]() |
However, let's not confuse that with Jimbo's allegedly slightly sleezy sexual reputation, which should be of no interest to us whatsoever. It is relevant, Doc. And I have access to further information about Jimbo's sexual reputation that is not only not "slightly" sleazy -- it would make your head spin. Since it is first-hand hearsay, I'm comfortable reporting that it does exist, but I'm uncomfortable repeating it word-for-word. That would be the choice of the person who holds that information first-hand. You see, as per usual with Jimbo, it's about hypocrisy and maintaining appearances otherwise. |
Doc glasgow |
![]()
Post
#6
|
Wikipedia:The Sump of All Human Knowledge ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 1,138 Joined: From: at home Member No.: 90 ![]() |
However, let's not confuse that with Jimbo's allegedly slightly sleezy sexual reputation, which should be of no interest to us whatsoever. It is relevant, Doc. And I have access to further information about Jimbo's sexual reputation that is not only not "slightly" sleazy -- it would make your head spin. Since it is first-hand hearsay, I'm comfortable reporting that it does exist, but I'm uncomfortable repeating it word-for-word. That would be the choice of the person who holds that information first-hand. You see, as per usual with Jimbo, it's about hypocrisy and maintaining appearances otherwise. This post is contemptible. "It is relevant" Sorry, the burden is on you to show that. I can't see how the hell it is. Jimbo is no icon of mine, but he's not setting himself up as a moral crusader, or perpetuating any "appearances otherwise." Muck chucking, just shows your own hypocrisy, nothing more. I neither care about, nor am I titivated by, Jimbo's sexlife. And I have access to further information about Jimbo's sexual reputation that is not only not "slightly" sleazy -- it would make your head spin. Since it is first-hand hearsay, I'm comfortable reporting that it does exist, That's even further beneath contempt. Now, you'll smear someone on the basis of information you wont disclose? So, we either "trust you" and your hearsay source, or we sink to your level and demand the details from you? Frankly, this is the post of an amoral hypocritical guttersnipe. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: |