QUOTE(Malleus @ Fri 30th April 2010, 12:34am)
QUOTE(Cla68 @ Fri 30th April 2010, 1:18am)
RfC time. I take it WMC did not appreciate being
called on his actions.
Lar doesn't either. He's quite happy to accuse others of what he himself is guilty of, or thinks they are.
Just in case there's any doubt though, I firmly believe that WMC's position is at best dishonest.
Can't we just ban em all? Bring me back too. : )
QUOTE(Moulton @ Fri 30th April 2010, 1:33am)
QUOTE(Malleus @ Thu 29th April 2010, 9:29pm)
The place is run by children and idiots who value "civility" above honesty.
So Sanger got it wrong? It's not adults peddling porn to children, but children peddling porn to adults?
I think that is the argument most pedophiles make: "she came onto me".
By the way, what about the BLP issues of Lar accusing WMC of doing something sneaky on Wikipedia regarding Climate Change in a parallel manner to "climategate"? Isn't that a big no-no? I don't really see any diffs or proof (no emails released yet).
This post has been edited by Ottava: