QUOTE(Moulton @ Tue 4th May 2010, 2:01am)
Actually, I was less intrigued by the prominence of pornographic content on WP than by the prominence of so many dominant characters exhibiting Cluster B characteristics. It occurs to me the apparent correlation may not be accidental.
Arguably, the latter is more damaging on the social development of children and young people.
Porn tends to be passive. It does not interact with you, you have to go and interact with it. I think it has a very imbalancing effect on young minds and, overall, a negative and wasteful effect on society but it cannot go out of its way to mess with you, mentally engage with you and work to reshape your behavior and thought patterns in the way that real abusive individuals can.
The Wikipedia has become a playground for such individuals in which naive victims are baited, ensnared and preyed upon. It is not a healthy place for children to be. The hard core amateur porn aspect is an easier way of gaining responsible individuals and entity's attention and communicating all this, and the values the Mediawiki Foundation are really promoting.This post has been edited by Cock-up-over-conspiracy: