QUOTE
# 06:18, 6 May 2010 Fran Rogers (talk | contribs) deleted "File:Saline Balls (4).JPG" ‎ (Out of project scope) (global usage; delinker log)
# 06:18, 6 May 2010 Fran Rogers (talk | contribs) deleted "File:Sauna.(expert19612005).JPG" ‎ (Out of project scope) (global usage; delinker log)
# 06:18, 6 May 2010 Fran Rogers (talk | contribs) deleted "File:Scrotum (2)Saline Injection.JPG" ‎ (Out of project scope) (global usage; delinker log)
# 06:18, 6 May 2010 Fran Rogers (talk | contribs) deleted "File:Scrotum (5)Saline Injection.JPG" ‎ (Out of project scope) (global usage; delinker log)
# 06:18, 6 May 2010 Fran Rogers (talk | contribs) deleted "File:Scrotum (8)Saline Balls.JPG" ‎ (Out of project scope) (global usage; delinker log)
etcetera, etceteraQUOTE
undelete File:Hodensack_(5).JPGPlease undelete File:Hodensack_(5).JPG which was deleted by you without discussion! A clearly non pornographic (guess - it's deleted ...) photograph of a de:Hodensack formerly used to depict de:Hodensackinfusion. Stop deleting useful images. That's vandalism. You are harming the project. --Saibo (Δ) 14:06, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
No, I am not undeleting them. Commons is not an amateur pornography site. We do not want or need images of exhibitionists mutilating their genitalia. Understood? Fran Rogers (talk) 01:00, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Yes, commons does need and want images of exhibitionists mutilating their genitalia. In your face, you repressed conservative American right wingers!
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Expert19612005_...JPGhttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bifurkation.JPGhttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pri...9612005%29..JPG