QUOTE(Stillwaterising @ Tue 8th June 2010, 7:32am)
Remember the above quote is from a fellow SG contract girl and is very telling.
Why would I bother to "remember" anything that came off SuicideGirls? It is a website full of tarts 'buying' revolution from a bottle of ink and a stick of surgical steel being sold and exploited by a single white male under the guise of "empowerment" and providing fap material for older men who probably never got it when they were young.
If that scene was cool for 15 minutes, it was a long, long time ago.
What I am taking about the will injection of coarse, hard-core, amateur pornography, and corruption of the concept and principles of the encyclopedia as a education device, which is at the same time being targeted at real children ... not adults dressing up or even playing as them.
How far from reality are you!?!
The problem with entering into any such discussion with you on such matters is unappealing because of the the kind of logic and strategy you are using. I am starting to think you just get off on it. It will take on your behalf to prove to me that you are not.
I do not know if you are a perv ... a pedo ... a porno-freak ... or a pederast but if you are not, and you have never had the misfortune to have a discussion with one over their obsession, then you could not know why it is so unappealing.
Back to the question ... "what about the children?" ... real children ... that most ridicule question on the Wikipedia.
Do you take the Mollerian position that a little bit of hard-core porn, or even a little bit of child erotica, never did anyone any harm?Needless to say, SuicideGirls is not an encyclopedia and not targeted at children. In fact, it had its own run in with the FBI a few years back and had to clean up its act a little.
There is nothing that enlightened or revolutionary about flashing your bits in public.