Child erotica Options

[carbuncle]

A coincidental meeting of some of popular WR themes and characters?

Stillwaterising, known for some strong opions about the recent porn deletions on Commons and for obessively polishing the bio of professional deepthroat enthusiast Heather Harmon, has added an image of an adult female model to Child erotica. That image comes from the uploads of the prolific Commons porn uploader Max Rebo Band.

I have no good explanation for why Stillwaterising would be adding a picture of an adult female -- she is a Suicide Girls model, so at least 18 -- to an article about "child" erotica.

[Cock-up-over-conspiracy]

Very good for you if you did ... (but is uploading fap material to the internet really called research these days?)

And what about the children?

[Stillwaterising]

And what about the children?

Ok, so what about the child, Loretta from SuicideGirls? She's from Sweden actually. Her profile page is here. I noticed instant cognitive dissonance at what appears to be ageplay.

As far as I know, all seven sets of images were all are of the same girl, the last six are dated 2005-2006. The first one, from which the Flickr picture was uploaded is dated 2007, so this one should be the most recent, right?

The photos were dated June 14, 2007, but is this the upload date or date of photography? The comments section goes

Abbiss/SUICIDEGIRL/Belgium
JUN 14, 2007 06:03 AM
Wow!! I already saw all your set but couldn\'t recognize you on these! It looks like old childish pics! Very very cute! You\'re beautiful

This girl isn't native English speaker, but what I think she's seems to be saying is: I've seen your other photo sets and this looks nothing like you. They look like old childhood photos! Very very cute! You're beautiful.
Remember the above quote is from a fellow SG contract girl and is very telling.

For policy on age verification see: http://suicidegirls.com/girlsfaq/

This post has been edited by Stillwaterising:

[Cock-up-over-conspiracy]

Remember the above quote is from a fellow SG contract girl and is very telling.

Why would I bother to "remember" anything that came off SuicideGirls? It is a website full of tarts 'buying' revolution from a bottle of ink and a stick of surgical steel being sold and exploited by a single white male under the guise of "empowerment" and providing fap material for older men who probably never got it when they were young.

If that scene was cool for 15 minutes, it was a long, long time ago.

What I am taking about the will injection of coarse, hard-core, amateur pornography, and corruption of the concept and principles of the encyclopedia as a education device, which is at the same time being targeted at real children ... not adults dressing up or even playing as them.

How far from reality are you!?!

The problem with entering into any such discussion with you on such matters is unappealing because of the the kind of logic and strategy you are using. I am starting to think you just get off on it. It will take on your behalf to prove to me that you are not.

I do not know if you are a perv ... a pedo ... a porno-freak ... or a pederast but if you are not, and you have never had the misfortune to have a discussion with one over their obsession, then you could not know why it is so unappealing.

Back to the question ... "what about the children?" ... real children ... that most ridicule question on the Wikipedia.

Do you take the Mollerian position that a little bit of hard-core porn, or even a little bit of child erotica, never did anyone any harm?

Needless to say, SuicideGirls is not an encyclopedia and not targeted at children. In fact, it had its own run in with the FBI a few years back and had to clean up its act a little.

There is nothing that enlightened or revolutionary about flashing your bits in public.