QUOTE(thekohser @ Tue 27th July 2010, 3:59pm)
QUOTE(thekohser @ Mon 19th July 2010, 2:20pm)
This will make for a nice topic on an upcoming Examiner.com story.
And lo and behold,
it's been published.
Very old story. Exclusion without clear and good reason, by a small oligarchy (perhaps just a single individual), is very poor process and leads to expectation of failure of the INC initiative. I've seen what happens when "disruptive critics" are excluded and, indeed, the normal response, ultimately, is collapse. That doesn't mean that disruption should be tolerated, but that the simplistic response of "ban" is dangerous and damaging. I didn't see that there was disruption happening, in fact. Just normal criticism of Wikipedia.