![]() |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Joseph100 |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Senior Member like Viridae ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: On Vacation Posts: 667 Joined: Member No.: 871 ![]() |
Wikipedia is evil and must be destroyed. I've made numerous attempts to try to work with them in order to edit and correct glaring factual mistakes, as well as blatant boldface bias on various biographies of Republican officeholders from Illinois.
What I have found is Wikipedia is a complete totally filled with hate filled Marxists children, and tin pot, petty dictators drunk with power, whose concept of fairness is distorted and corrupt and with out control. So, I am looking for advice on how to go about to diminish, destroy and neutralize Wikipedia. Any reasonable suggestion will be taken under advisement. For those who are pro-Wikipedia. All I have to say is this... there is nothing that you could say, do, or argue which would convinced me that Wikipedia has any merit, or good for the body politic or the Internet at large. It is my sworn belief that Wikipedia is absolutely a cesspool of evil. Thank you This post has been edited by Joseph100: |
![]() ![]() |
Yanksox |
![]()
Post
#2
|
New Member ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 20 Joined: Member No.: 1,014 ![]() |
Wikipedia is evil and must be destroyed. I don't view it as evil but as excessively misguided. Like communism it is fantastic in theory, but once placed into action it fails to account for the element of human nature. If you want to see it's downfall, let it run it's course. Wikipedia as a foundation will last, but the culture itself has been slowly permeated by a plague that affects other internet cultures (i.e. newgrounds, and the one at the tip of my tongue that allowed you to apply for licensces online). So, to be honest, Wikipedia (probably with the Essjay situation) has jumped the shark. I think it is a nice thing to collect and allow for a dumping ground of information, but with the factor of humans (biographies, POV pushing) it is far too dangerous and real than the perimeters established in the cyber world. |
Kurt M. Weber |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 258 Joined: Member No.: 199 ![]() |
|
Jonny Cache |
![]()
Post
#4
|
τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γÎγονε ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 5,100 Joined: Member No.: 398 ![]() |
Like communism it is fantastic in theory I would submit that no collectivist ideology is "fantastic in theory" precisely the reasons that make it unbearable in practice. Rand had an excellent remark on this ... I must find it. Wikipedia is about as Marxist as The Hell's Angels, or some Electric Avenue Street Gang. Wikimedia, Incorpulated is about as collectivist as the Beverly Hills Yacht Club. It is simply laughable to attribute any of the usual political ideologies to them. They are for their ownselves, only, the Self Love Of The Hive (SLOTH). Jonny (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/cool.gif) |
Kurt M. Weber |
![]()
Post
#5
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 258 Joined: Member No.: 199 ![]() |
Like communism it is fantastic in theory I would submit that no collectivist ideology is "fantastic in theory" precisely the reasons that make it unbearable in practice. Rand had an excellent remark on this ... I must find it. Wikipedia is about as Marxist as The Hell's Angels, or some Electric Avenue Street Gang. Wikimedia, Incorpulated is about as collectivist as the Beverly Hills Yacht Club. It is simply laughable to attribute any of the usual political ideologies to them. They are for their ownselves, only, the Self Love Of The Hive (SLOTH). Jonny (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/cool.gif) I wasn't talking about Wikipedia...I was talking about collectivist ideologies themselves. |
Jonny Cache |
![]()
Post
#6
|
τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γÎγονε ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 5,100 Joined: Member No.: 398 ![]() |
Like communism it is fantastic in theory I would submit that no collectivist ideology is "fantastic in theory" precisely the reasons that make it unbearable in practice. Rand had an excellent remark on this ... I must find it. Wikipedia is about as Marxist as The Hell's Angels, or some Electric Avenue Street Gang. Wikimedia, Incorpulated is about as collectivist as the Beverly Hills Yacht Club. It is simply laughable to attribute any of the usual political ideologies to them. They are for their ownselves, only, the Self Love Of The Hive (SLOTH). Jonny (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/cool.gif) I wasn't talking about Wikipedia ... I was talking about collectivist ideologies themselves. I forget exactly, but I don't think I was responding to anything in that nest of quote boxes itself so much as I was commenting on the general trend of the whole thread above it. Jonny (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/cool.gif) |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: |