QUOTE(Doc glasgow @ Wed 27th October 2010, 8:41am)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
I trust that you will never again complain about Wikipedia having a biography on anyone again.
No matter how unnotable they are, if the information is verifiable online, Kohs believes that's fair game.
With that mantra, I now list you you as an associate on [[List of Wikipedia Kool-aid drinkers]].
I trust that your logic fails to consider that I sign my pieces on Examiner with my real name, such that attorneys for my subjects can contact me with any potential libel torts. They would also be able to contact Examiner itself, as I've been professionally vetted by their human resources process.
Let me know the day that a Wikipedia article is ever attributed to one person who signs their real name to the article, such that an attorney would have a clear path for legal action. Also, let me know when the Wikimedia Foundation assumes liability for the content its vetted writers choose to publish.
Doc, are you just trying to sound like a nitwit for giggles, or are you really this incapable of making apt comparisons?