QUOTE(Silver seren @ Fri 31st December 2010, 1:48pm)
Ugh...he's being a total jerk. G5 is one of the most worthless of the speedy deletion criteria.
Though I suppose I have to ask. Did you originally make that article, kohser? Since it was made by a blocked user and you brought it up, i'm assuming it was you.
Brandon blocked the user months after the article had been created and was not causing anyone any anxiety. You might want to talk to
Frank -- he told me he wouldn't be surprised if Brandon's block was wholly off target. You might also want to look at "
Graffiti for hire", authored by the same blocked user, but now lovingly restored and expanded by none other than Blofeld.
Do you really think I run such an expansive paid-to-edit network?
Anyway, I'm not answering you directly because I don't do that any more, when it comes to paid editing. My e-book is going to be coming out soon, and the #1 word of advice I provide is "
Never disclose. Never." Because no good can come of it, whether you were a paid editor or not, because if you weren't, you're just going to send the Wikipediot scurrying off for more evidence, and if they find the real paid editor, you've only made an enemy in the business, that you ratted out a fellow paid editor. (See Anvil Media and their article about Attensa, e.g.)
The only article I'm comfortable disclosing is
Arch Coal, which I did write, but not for payment, even though Jimmy Wales & Co. thought that I did.