QUOTE(Silver seren @ Sun 2nd January 2011, 6:58pm)
So you say. We'll see. It's still a valid article.
Not that it bothers me, since I see this sort of thing very frequently on Wikipedia, but you didn't follow one lick of the "attribution" portion of the licensed content that you
plagiarized from the original author. Unless, of course, you were in touch with her or him, and were granted a waiver of some sort.