I had really hoped they'd keep themselves under control after FeloniousMonk's desysopping a while back, but they appear to be back at it again.
Cla68 seems to have stirred them up by
trying to add a "Scientific theories" category to the Intelligent Design article. Don't think it was a really good idea, but it doesn't justify the reaction.
Now Hrafn has decided to tag various articles as being Creationism stubs, including
James Tour, a guy who has specifically said that he's not an intelligent design supporter. He signed a petition, so therefore he's a creationist, even if he says otherwise, right? Never mind that he's done nothing else related to creationism, and all indicators are that he never will. Now Guettarda's
gaming to try to keep the tag in (since when is the burden of evidence on the one removing material from a BLP?).
I really did not want to get involved with these people again, but I'm not letting them go back to messing with BLPs like they did in the past.
This post has been edited by Sxeptomaniac: