![]() |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
thekohser |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 10,274 Joined: Member No.: 911 ![]() |
Note that there are two questions in this poll. One about critics of Wikipedia, and the other about critics of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Note that "foremost" could be described as the "most famous person" who criticizes Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation. Or, "foremost" could be described as the "most dedicated critic", regardless of fame. Or, it could easily be described as the "most effective or influential critic". How you choose is up to you. The voting will remain open until the end of Sunday, April 3, 2001. |
![]() ![]() |
Doc glasgow |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Wikipedia:The Sump of All Human Knowledge ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 1,138 Joined: From: at home Member No.: 90 ![]() |
I notice Danny Wool was for some reason omitted from foremost critic of the WMF. Pity, I think he's have stopped the Gregory Kohs self-glorification train in its tracks.
Greg is one of the most persistent critics of the WMF, but unlike Wool, he's yet to land a punch. They actually had to put out press releases disputing Wool's allegations. |
thekohser |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 10,274 Joined: Member No.: 911 ![]() |
I notice Danny Wool was for some reason omitted from foremost critic of the WMF. Pity, I think he's have stopped the Gregory Kohs self-glorification train in its tracks. Greg is one of the most persistent critics of the WMF, but unlike Wool, he's yet to land a punch. They actually had to put out press releases disputing Wool's allegations. That's really weird, because I had Danny Wool on my hand-written list, and I could have sworn he was there on the electronic poll initially. Am I losing my mind? Did a moderator modify the poll candidates? Edit: Is there a way to now include Danny Wool as a candidate? Danny and I have had friendly conversations by phone multiple times, and he introduced me to someone who is now a mutual friend. There's no way I would want to slight him in any way. This post has been edited by thekohser: |
Doc glasgow |
![]()
Post
#4
|
Wikipedia:The Sump of All Human Knowledge ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 1,138 Joined: From: at home Member No.: 90 ![]() |
I notice Danny Wool was for some reason omitted from foremost critic of the WMF. Pity, I think he's have stopped the Gregory Kohs self-glorification train in its tracks. Greg is one of the most persistent critics of the WMF, but unlike Wool, he's yet to land a punch. They actually had to put out press releases disputing Wool's allegations. That's really weird, because I had Danny Wool on my hand-written list, and I could have sworn he was there on the electronic poll initially. Am I losing my mind? Did a moderator modify the poll candidates? Edit: Is there a way to now include Danny Wool as a candidate? Danny and I have had friendly conversations by phone multiple times, and he introduced me to someone who is now a mutual friend. There's no way I would want to slight him in any way. I doubt Danny will be slighted. I doubt he will care. However, it may make the poll result a bit questionable. You can't add someone to a poll now, and even if you could it would invalidate all the votes cast. You've either got to decide it's just a bit of fun and never mind, or start again. |
thekohser |
![]()
Post
#5
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 10,274 Joined: Member No.: 911 ![]() |
However, it may make the poll result a bit questionable. You can't add someone to a poll now, and even if you could it would invalidate all the votes cast. You've either got to decide it's just a bit of fun and never mind, or start again. I agree, but I think the poll result was going to be "a bit questionable" regardless. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: |